Real world use of Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19 in immunocompromised individuals: data from the OCTOPUS study. (preprint)

We report real world use over time in immunocompromised subjects receiving tixagevimab/cilgavimab (T/C) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Observational study on participants receiving T/C PrEP stratified: never had COVID-19 (NoC), hybrids (H) and breakthrough infections (BTIs) if COVID-19 before or after PrEP, respectively. Anti-RBD IgG and BA.5 neutralizing antibodies (nAbs), mucosal IgG, T-cell immunity at the administration of T/C (T0), 3 (T1), 6 (T2), and 9 (T3) months after, were measured. Comparison of markers in each group across timepoints, Poisson regression model for BTIs incidence rate ratios were performed. N=231 participants: median age 63 years (IQR 54.0-73.0), 84% hematological disease, median vaccine dose of three. N=72 NoC, 103 H and 56 (24%) BTIs, mostly mild/moderate, IR 4.2 (95%CI 3.2-5.4) BTIs/100 patients-months, no factors associated with. A significant increase of anti-RBD IgG at T1 was observed in all the groups, with a decline at T2. GMTs of anti-BA.5 nAbs were low at T1 for all the groups and around/below the cut off. No changes of IFN-γ. Overall, a mucosal response was observed at T1. An incidence of 24% of mild/moderate BTIs was observed. Anti-RBD IgG levels persistence was ensured, BA.5 nAbs were low/undetectable, cellular T immunity remained stable.

Neutralizing antibodies to Omicron after the fourth SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine dose in immunocompromised patients highlight the need of additional boosters (preprint)

Immunocompromised patients have been shown to have an impaired immune response to COVID-19 vaccines. Here we compared the B-cell, T-cell and neutralizing antibody response to WT and Omicron BA.2 SARS-CoV-2 virus after the fourth dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in patients with hematological malignancies (HM, n=71), solid tumors (ST, n=39) and immune-rheumatological (ID, n=25) diseases. We show that the T-cell response is similarly boosted by the fourth dose across the different subgroups, while the antibody response is improved only in patients not receiving B-cell targeted therapies, independent on the pathology. However, 9% of patients with anti-RBD antibodies did not have neutralizing antibodies to both virus variants, while an additional 5.7% did not have neutralizing antibodies to Omicron BA.2, making these patients particularly vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The increment of neutralizing antibodies was very similar towards Omicron BA.2 and WT virus after the third or fourth dose of vaccine, suggesting that there is no preferential skewing towards either virus variant with the booster dose. The only limited step is the amount of antibodies that are elicited after vaccination, thus increasing the probability of developing neutralizing antibodies to both variants of virus. Hence, additional booster doses are recommended to frail patients.

mRNA-COVID19 vaccination can be considered safe and tolerable for frail patients (preprint)

Background Frail patients are considered at relevant risk of complications due to COVID-19 infection and, for this reason, are prioritized candidates for vaccination. As these patients were originally not included in the registration trials, fear related to vaccine side-effects and disease worsening was one of the reasons for vaccine hesitancy. Herein we report the safety profile of the prospective, multicenter, national VAX4FRAIL study (NCT04848493) to evaluate vaccines in a large trans-disease cohort of patients with solid or hematological malignancies, neurological and rheumatological diseases. Methods Between March 3rd and September 2nd, 2021, 566 patients were evaluable for safety endpoint: 105 received the mRNA-1273 vaccine and 461 the BNT162b2 vaccine. Frail patients were defined per protocol as patients under treatment with hematological malignancies (131), solid tumors (191), immune-rheumatological diseases (86), and neurological diseases (158), including multiple sclerosis and generalized myasthenia. The impact of the vaccination on the health status of patients was assessed through a questionnaire focused on the first week after each vaccine dose. Results The most frequently reported moderate-severe adverse events were pain at the injection site (60.3% after the first dose, 55.4% after the second), fatigue (30.1% - 41.7%), bone pain (27.4% - 27.2%) and headache (11.8% - 18.9%). Risk factors associated with the occurrence of severe symptoms after vaccine administration were identified through a multivariate logistic regression analysis: age was associated with severe fever presentation (younger patients vs. middle-aged vs. older ones), females presented a higher probability of severe pain at the injection site, fatigue, headache, and bone pain; the mRNA-1237 vaccine was associated with a higher probability of severe pain at the injection site and fever. After the first dose, patients presenting a severe symptom were at a relevant risk of recurrence of the same severe symptom after the second one. Overall, 11 patients (1.9%) after the first dose and 7 (1.2%) after the second one required to postpone or suspend the disease-specific treatment. Finally, 2 fatal events occurred among our 566 patients. These two events were considered unrelated to the vaccine. Conclusions Our study reports that mRNA-COVID-19 vaccination is safe also in frail patients as expected side effects were manageable and had a minimum impact on patient care path.